|
50 replies to this topic
#1
Puyai Baan Posted 2010-02-26 11:51:20
UNCONFIRMED:
Chiang Mai red shirt radio inciting followers to grab arms INN Reporting DAAD Radio Inciting Followers to Grab Arms INN News Agency is reporting that DAAD radio stations in Chiang Mai province are inciting followers to arm themselves in what they are calling a major war against the government. Source: http://www.tannetwor...?DataID=1025509 -- Tan Network 2010-02-26 #2
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 11:57:04
What frequency is this?
Edited by earlofwindermere, 2010-02-26 11:57:25. #3
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 12:03:19
We're listening at the office. 92.5 FM They're meeting at Wororot Hotel (which I'm assuming is near the market)
#4
Puyai Baan Posted 2010-02-26 12:08:59
No further reports, you can follow our live updates and timeline here:
http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/Thailand-Edg...si-t342438.html #5
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 12:20:29
When discussing the coup, democracy, Abhist and the resentment of the peasants to the PAD on another thread about a year ago I predicted that a reaction like this might happen. Here's a link to the post: Possible Armed Uprising. At that time I was speaking about Bangkok but a similar event in Chiang Mai is every bit as feasable. Let's hope this doesn't happen and it all blows over.
#6
Black Shirt Member Posted 2010-02-26 12:26:41
woah hope nothing comes of it
#7
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 12:43:16
great respect for the law and very democratic of them of them as ever;
"we want democracy" they say while violently trying to overthrow a democratic government #8
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 12:56:17
I'd be a bit careful by reporting highly charged but unverified reports from government or government-linked sources, very much including The Nation et al.
Unless it comes straight from a Red source or is otherwise verified I would practice some constraint. Edited by WinnieTheKhwai, 2010-02-26 12:56:32. #9
Platinum Member Posted 2010-02-26 13:01:15
I'd be a bit careful by reporting highly charged but unverified reports from government or government-linked sources, very much including The Nation et al. Unless it comes straight from a Red source or is otherwise verified I would practice some constraint. Well there is this little legal twist to it, if they sign it, they're in for treason, wouldn't they? So would anyone dare to put his signature below this call? I mean just trying to be a bit realistic.... concerning the magnitude of such a call and the timing, plus the current situation! Just a wee bit realistic... at times.. isn't necessarily a bad thing, is it? Edited by Samuian, 2010-02-26 13:01:40. #10
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 13:01:29
We've been listening to the station for the past hour. They're calling people to join them at the hotel but no mention of arms yet.
#11
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 13:54:30
Thanks Earl. Best to stick to the facts in highly charged times. Before you know it one side or the other runs off the deep end.
#12
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 13:59:09
Few days ago I read about the gov announcing a 'crackdown' on such poisoning radiostations ?
#13
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 14:13:14
Right, and a questionable report of what was allegedly said would be just the ticket to silence it, and further increase censorship.
#14
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 14:18:39
great respect for the law and very democratic of them of them as ever; "we want democracy" they say while violently trying to overthrow a democratic government This government isn't remotely close to anything that can be called democratic. The current government was put into power by a military coup de tat not by free and fair election. The entire upper house like the judiciary aren't elected, they are handpicked by the elite. In the two elections since the coup Abhisit's party has both times been soundly defeated and yet he has still somehow managed to remain PM. (for a full explaination refer to this Timesonline article: Abhisit article ) The red shirts (mostly peasants) may be a group of ignorant reactionaries but they have legitimate grounds to be angry. Nearly every political party representing them has been outlawed by the ruling class. The elitists have been treating them like dirt since the beginning of Siamese history and world history is full of stories of uprisings instigated by much less than the Thai poor have endured. I am in no way in favor of armed violence but if history is any indicator, at some time it is inevitable. reason for edit: to fix link Edited by Groongthep, 2010-02-26 14:24:54. #15
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 14:30:35
great respect for the law and very democratic of them of them as ever; "we want democracy" they say while violently trying to overthrow a democratic government This government isn't remotely close to anything that can be called democratic. The current government was put into power by a military coup de tat not by free and fair election. The entire upper house like the judiciary aren't elected, they are handpicked by the elite. None of the above is very accurate. I'd say it's 'reasonably democratic'. Anyway I don't feel like going into the complete history of events since the coup. I think elections would be a good idea so Abhisit can get his own mandate, but I would also not call the current situation unacceptable. Quote The red shirts (mostly peasants) may be a group of ignorant reactionaries but they have legitimate grounds to be angry. Again I would not call them reactionaries. Those left-wing / right-wing qualifications don't really transform well to Thai politics. Either way there's a wide variety of causes, grievances and interests out there, again way to much to get into here. #16
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 14:38:51
All quiet on the southern front. Nobody has grabbed my arm so far.
Monsieur Hulot reporting from Saraphi #17
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 14:50:21
The red shirts (mostly peasants) may be a group of ignorant reactionaries but they have legitimate grounds to be angry. Nearly every political party representing them has been outlawed by the ruling class. The elitists have been treating them like dirt since the beginning of Siamese history and world history is full of stories of uprisings instigated by much less than the Thai poor have endured. I am in no way in favor of armed violence but if history is any indicator, at some time it is inevitable. #18
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 14:57:31
No different from India. Gandhi was pretty peaceful. And 'taking matters into their own hands' can have VERY unpredictable outcomes. It's not like the entire underclass or indeed the entire Red movement sees eye to eye on everything. I see plenty idiots out there, along with the very sensible people. Would hate to see the idiots floating to the top.
#19
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 15:05:46
And 'taking matters into their own hands' can have VERY unpredictable outcomes. #20
Platinum Member Posted 2010-02-26 15:24:13
We're listening at the office. 92.5 FM They're meeting at Wororot Hotel (which I'm assuming is near the market) The Reds have based themselves on the corner of the road that runs just behind Wat Prasing. It's opposite a hotel (I think it may be the Worowot) that's owned by a Thaksin supporter. They've been there for months. If they do become violent, we can't rely on the police to restore order as the police are incompetent and many are supporters of Thaksin. More likely the government will introduce martial law the way they did after the last coup and the army will be used to maintain law and order. #21
Platinum Member Posted 2010-02-26 15:28:05
And 'taking matters into their own hands' can have VERY unpredictable outcomes. All power rests with the unelected 'elite' and that's what many people are upset about. #22
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 15:46:10
True; I would agree with most of that. (I'd hesitate to call it 'good vs evil' though, that's too much of a hyperbole even for me.
#23
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 15:49:09
great respect for the law and very democratic of them of them as ever; "we want democracy" they say while violently trying to overthrow a democratic government This government isn't remotely close to anything that can be called democratic. The current government was put into power by a military coup de tat not by free and fair election. The entire upper house like the judiciary aren't elected, they are handpicked by the elite. In the two elections since the coup Abhisit's party has both times been soundly defeated and yet he has still somehow managed to remain PM. (for a full explaination refer to this Timesonline article: Abhisit article ) The red shirts (mostly peasants) may be a group of ignorant reactionaries but they have legitimate grounds to be angry. Nearly every political party representing them has been outlawed by the ruling class. The elitists have been treating them like dirt since the beginning of Siamese history and world history is full of stories of uprisings instigated by much less than the Thai poor have endured. I am in no way in favor of armed violence but if history is any indicator, at some time it is inevitable. reason for edit: to fix link Hear! Hear! Abhisits regime may be just about legal due to such political deep thinkers as Newin Chitlob and Banharm Silapa Archa who conveniently switched sides when threatened and promised tasty jobs in government, but it is illegitimate as it only exists because of the judiciaries partial interpretation of the corruption laws particularly in banning the late Khun Samak for appearing on a cookery porgramme. I share hopes that there will be no violence, but it is difficult to see what the Red shirts can do when the democratic avenue has been effectively closed off to them. #24
Incredible Member Posted 2010-02-26 15:59:50
Well, they could wait for the next scheduled elections, or when Newin & Banharn decide to jump ship again. I'd prefer that over a killing fields scenario. Other than that I agree with you completely.
#25
Senior Member Posted 2010-02-26 16:52:35
Sure Winnie, but they won the last election and the army and the judiciary and the ruling élite in general didn't respect the outcome of that one. Why should they respect the outcome of the next one? Also the election will (presumably) be fought under the 2007 constitution which had one obejective: Stop Thaksin. Unfortunately for them even their gerrymandered constituencies and proprtional representation system failed to stop Thaksins nominees from winning - all the military constitution succeeded in doing was to hand a disproportionate amount of influence to the likes of Mr Newin and Mr Banharm. As it was illegal to campaign against the 07 constitution it is inherantly flawed.
Ultimately the only way out for this country is to have a free and fair election under the 97 constitution with all sides agreeing to respect the outcome. There must be clear and transparent rules about electoral bribery with mass bribes being clamped down on, but some latitude being given to local canvassers giving out mobile phone cards or the odd bag of rice which have long been a feature of Thai elections. |
Sponsored by ... |
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board